Writing visually is not only about crafting words that flow smoothly and evoke vivid imagery. It is also about not including words that detract from that imagery or interrupt the flow. The screenwriter's goal is to create a script in which the writing flows so smoothly the reader becomes part of the story, watching it from within.
Here are some problems aspiring screenwriters should avoid when writing a spec script:
"We hear" or "We see"
Phrases such as "We hear" and "We see" should never appear in a spec script. They momentarily force readers outside the story. You want the reader to become so involved in your story she forgets the rest of the world exists. You want readers to live and breathe your story as they read it.
The imagery evoked by your words should drive what we're seeing or hearing as readers. Phrases like "We see" and "We hear" make the reader feel as if he or she is part of an external audience, not part of the story itself. Instead of reinforcing the idea the reader is immersed in a powerful story, those phrases do nothing but remind her she's holding a script.
Camera directions such as “PAN” and “CLOSE UP”
Avoid the use of camera directions to describe shots in a spec script. Once your script becomes a film in production, camera angles and shots will become the responsibility of the director and the director of photography.
As a screenwriter, your responsibility is to craft words that trigger the desired imagery so those individual "shots" move naturally through the reader's mind.
When writing a script, screenwriters have a very vivid mental picture of the images they are trying to convey. Most of us think in film, meaning we imagine our story unfolding as a series of images or visual scenes. The best way for a writer to direct the script is to format the description in such a way the shots appear to separate themselves. This is called the White Space technique. With the correct use of this technique, you can pace your script and divide each image as if it were its own shot.
As you write your script, imagine where you would change the camera angle or shot. At that point, begin a new paragraph of description. Keep your paragraphs shorter for a rapidly paced scene and slightly longer (but still only a few sentences!) to maintain a slower paced scene. For more detail on the best ways to use the White Space technique in your script, check out the article titled Using White Space to Hold a Reader's Attention.
Make sure your description conveys the desired imagery. If you envision a close-up on a specific object, make that object the focus of your description. Direct the reader's attention through your words instead of through camera angles.
Beginning and ending each page with (CONTINUED)
At one time, screenwriters were required to begin and end each page with the (CONTINUED) notation to indicate, obviously, the script continued onto the next page. Later, the (CONTINUED) at the top of the page was ditched but the one at the bottom of the page was retained. In the past decade, the use of (CONTINUED) at either the top or bottom of the page has been almost entirely abandoned. It is no longer a requirement and is sometimes viewed as more of a nuisance than anything else.
The main reason you shouldn't bother to include (CONTINUED) at the top and bottom of each page is that it wastes a significant amount of space. It requires two lines at the top of the page and another two lines at the bottom. In a 90-page script, those extra four lines per page can amount to several pages of wasted space. In a screenplay, space is a precious commodity that definitely should not be wasted. And, as Denny Martin Flinn notes in his book, How NOT to Write a Screenplay, "Anyone reading your screenplay who doesn't know he's supposed to turn the page is a numskull."
POV (indicating the camera's point of view)
POV is a camera direction, not a writing technique. Do not use a POV notation unless the imagery seen from one character's point of view is distinctly different from the rest of the scene and, more importantly, that difference is integral to the plot.
The scene below provides an example of an inappropriate use of the POV technique.
**************************
Martha stands at the counter, one arm holding the baby at her hip, the other arm working frantically to one-handedly put together lunch for the three children who mill about the kitchen.
John sits at the kitchen table, leisurely reading the morning newspaper. He ignores Martha with deliberate concentration.
JOHN’S POV
Two of the children scurry on hands and knees under the table at his feet in a game of chase.
**************************
In the above example, the image of the children running under the table is part of the overall scene. A shot of the children crawling under the table could be taken from any of several different camera angles and does not specifically require John’s POV. The POV is not integral to the storyline and is not separate from the rest of the kitchen scene, so it is not necessary.
Always remember, camera angles are the realm of the director and the director of photography, not the writer. There is no need to forfeit two lines of space in your screenplay for an unnecessary camera direction.
Transitions such as “CUT TO” and “DISSOLVE TO”
Spelling out transitions is another technique reserved for a shooting script. You should not use transitions in your spec script.
A transition indicates the movement from one scene to the next. This event is already indicated by the use of a slugline defining the new location and time of day. Since the new slugline has already made the reader aware of the shift from one scene to the next, the transition simply takes up space, and space is a precious commodity in a script.
I've heard many writers attempt to justify their use of transitions... "I wanted to let the reader feel the intensity of the scene by cutting it off with a CUT TO," or, "I wanted to let the reader know time had passed by using a DISSOLVE TO."
Your story and the quality of your writing, not your transition, should cause the reader to feel the intensity of the scene. If your story isn't already intense, no amount of CUT TO's is going to make it that way. CUT TO's are only going to interrupt the smooth flow of your words and cause the reader's eyes to jump across the page.
When the script is put into production, the director and editor will determine which type of transition is used, and their decisions will be noted in the shooting script.
Capitalization of specific words to draw attention
In the 80's and 90's, the use of capitalization throughout a script in order to draw attention to specific words became trendy — so trendy, in fact, some writers tended to capitalize fifteen or more words per page, not even including the appropriate capitalization of sluglines, first-appearance character names, and dialogue headers.
Writers capitalize words in this manner with the intent to force a more vivid image into the reader's mind, but using capitalization doesn't necessarily create a more vivid image. Instead, the capitalization makes the sentence visually awkward and detracts from the mental imagery of the scene. It cuts into the flow of the sentence and forces the reader's eyes to stop and adjust. And what happens whenever readers must stop and adjust? They remember they're reading a script, which is exactly what you don't want. In order to avoid constantly reminding people they're reading a script, your writing must flow visually, and capitalizing words halts that flow.
Many writers mistakenly believe sounds, objects or actions to which the writer wishes to add emphasis must always be capitalized. Capitalization does have its uses, and those uses can occasionally have the desired effect of evoking a sense of urgency or intensity, but only when used sparingly.
Your choice of words, not the capitalization of those words, should be what adds focus to a specific object or action. If a word or descriptive phrase doesn't possess the impact you feel it should, check out my previous article titled Selecting the Most Powerful Words for Your Novel or Screenplay, or simply open a thesaurus and find a more intense and dramatic word to use in its place.
Standard disclaimer: Please note, web browsers don't allow for the presentation of a screenplay in its correct format. Excerpts and examples of screenplays found in these articles should not be used as examples of proper screenplay layout. To learn how to properly format your screenplay, David Trottier’s The Screenwriter’s Bible: A Complete Guide to Writing, Formatting, and Selling Your Script is an excellent reference.

{ 31 comments… read them below or add one }
Wow, thank you for the tips. They help a lot. The mistakes I made, when I began writing, was I thought that you had to put in the camera angles, shots, and capitalization of each action word (more trouble with the latter), and when I looked for help, it was always 50-50 or they didn’t know. I have had an agent read my script, and he never even mentioned the lack of capitalized action words, so my long dilemma is finally gone. Thank you.
I also would like to express my thanks to you. I have been in the process of rewriting a screenplay after my first critique, and have been steadily researching more and more on a proper format. Until now the information I’ve found has been either out dated or just flat out inaccurate. This article has eliminated so many questions. I now feel confident that I’m on the right track once and for all. Thank you again!
Hi RJ and Ariah,
Thanks so much for your comments! I’m glad you enjoyed the article and found it helpful.
~ Kris
Hello again Kris. I have a question after happening upon a very helpful screenplay analysis guide by Michael Ray Brown. I understand that its necessary to double space between slug lines and the previous and following action/description; however, I’m unsure if it still protocol to triple space before a new scene heading, or just stick with a normal double space to save room?
Mr. Brown’s guide seems to be fairly up to date as it was last updated in 2008, yet I remember reading somewhere else that double spacing is the norm. Can you update me on what the standard is please? Thank you again for posting such informative blogs, I now follow your page with great anticipation.
With much gratitude,
Ariah
Hi Ariah,
I’ve never heard of using a triple space for anything in a screenplay. Even when you are using a transition (CUT TO, DISSOLVE TO, etc.), it is followed by a double space rather than a triple space.
The ScriptFrenzy web site has a great article describing how each element in the screenplay should be formatted. Toward the end of the article, there is a list that indicates the appropriate spacing between each element. There is also a link at the bottom of the page where you can download a 10-page sample script in PDF format to use as an example.
~ Kris
Thank you so very much. I will certainly take a look at the ScriptFrenzy site, I’m sure it will put an end to any remaining questions I have on formatting. Thanks again for the wonderful advice!
Hi Kris!
Thanks for the great advice thus far. I have a problem regarding the pacing of my work and i’ve found myself in a tricky situation.
I love ensemble pieces that follow three or four storylines, using dialogue as a potent tool. Unfortunately, using conventional methods, it takes too long to introduce my characters (according to many producers). To counter this, i’ve tried narration which works perfectly in many neo noir movies such as mine. Once again, this is something that attracts many frowns.
Some of the best ensemble pieces are detailed at the beginning but for a spec writer, producers just don’t want to accept this type of writing. I’m considering throwing in the towel since i’m certain that this is the genre that i’m great at but unable to get producers to read beyond page 10.
Anyway, i’m sorry for the lengthy post. Thanks again.
What about using continued on the same line as your slug line
if the action extends to the next page?
I havent seen this adressed anywhere…
FI: INT. BOAT – DAY (CONTINUED)
Sorry but with the “CONTINUOUS” question i just asked a little more detail…this is a spec script in consideration.
Hi cweed63,
The slugline typically isn’t repeated when the action extends to the next page. You can continue the action on the next page without prefacing it with a slugline or with a (CONTINUED) notation.
~ Kris
thank you….but to be clear you are saying there is no need for a slugline at the top of the next page if the scene is continued in the same place? with no disrespect i thought every page HAD to start/begin with a slugline (on a spec script) are you saying that is not the case?
Hi cweed63,
There’s no need to include a slugline at the top of every page, regardless of whether you’re writing a spec script or a shooting script. You only need to include a slugline at the beginning of each new scene. Even when a scene extends for several pages, you only use a slugline at the beginning of the scene. When the scene changes, you include a new slugline to indicate the new location and time of day.
Whenever the location changes, it’s considered a new scene. Also, if you have two consecutive scenes in the same location but the first scene takes place in the morning and the next scene takes place at night, each scene would need its own slugline.
~ Kris
Sorry to contradict, but David Trottier’s book mentions various instances where sounds and sound effects should be capitalized and why. I would recommend everyone to get a copy of the book, as it has many very specific recommendations. I’ve found that the advice you find on-line is often contradictory, so it’s good to go with some kind of standard.
Hi Job,
I recommend Trottier’s book for basic screenplay format rather than for choices relating to writing style. Deciding when to capitalize sounds is a stylistic choice. My note at the end of this article relates instead to basic formatting, such as where sluglines, dialogue, etc., should be placed on the page of your script. I include the same note at the end of every article that contains an excerpt from a screenplay because browsers like Internet Explorer and Firefox do a poor job of displaying text in screenplay format. I always make sure to mention that readers should check out a book like Trottier’s to learn how their screenplays should really look.
Thanks for checking out the blog! I hope you come back to visit often.
~ Kris
Hi Kris,
Thanks for responding. I actually have to apologize: the book I was looking at is not Trottier’s but Riley’s “The Hollywood Standard”. Oops! But, it is recommended as an authority so I’m not completely off-base! I should check out Trottier, I guess. Is it worthwhile?
Job
Hi Job,
Trottier’s book is worth checking out. As with most screenwriting guides nowadays, its value for you will depend largely on how much screenwriting experience you currently have. I’d definitely recommend the book to beginning screenwriters, but people who have studied the industry and have already written three or four screenplays probably won’t get as much out of it. (But, that’s true of almost any screenwriting how-to book.)
Trottier’s book has stood the test of time, and I think one of the reasons it remains popular is because the information is valuable and is presented in a clear and straightforward way. The publisher released a newly revised edition in August, so if you decide to pick up a copy, make sure to get the most recent edition.
~ Kris
Hi Kris,
A quick question.
I write with final Draft, and it always includes the (Continued) at the top and bottom of the page when the scene runs for more then one page.
My question is: Is that an exception for using them? Or should I figure out how to disable this feature in the Final Draft software and not use them?
Hi Brent,
The (CONTINUED) notations are optional, but I don’t know of any recent scripts that have them. Using the notations on the top and/or bottom of every page wastes a lot of space. Everyone is trying to make their screenplays appear shorter rather than longer, so notations like (CONTINUED) that state the obvious and take up unnecessary space are slowly falling by the wayside.
There’s a setting in Final Draft that allows you to disable the (CONTINUED) on the top or bottom of the page. You can disable one or the other individually or disable both.
~ Kris
Hmm, I have Final Draft too, the latest version, and I don’t have this “continued” issue at all. In fact, I started putting it in manually, but after this article I see that it’s not necessary at all.
My question is this, I know the whole theory about a page or script equalling a minute of film, but I have some descriptive paragraphs that are maybe take up a quarter of the page at most if not less, but on film would be a few minutes. With that in mind, if I write a 90 page script, it will surely translate into way more than 90 minutes. But turning in a 75 or 80 page script seems too short as well. How to deal with this discrepancy?
Hi Kiki,
One-page-per-minute is only a guideline but it’s one of the more reliable ways to estimate the potential length of a film based on screenplay length. Some pages will amount to more than one minute of screen time while other pages will need much less than a minute, and in the end it usually averages out. In all the stages that come between the sale of a script and the final cut of the film, many other factors will affect the film’s length, but the one-page-per-minute guideline gives people a starting point to work with.
If you have a descriptive paragraph that seems like it might require a few minutes of screen time, a good approach is to dig deeper into that section of the page. Sometimes you can edit it further to streamline the writing. In some cases, you’ll find you can remove certain things. In other cases, you’ll find you need to keep all the description but the paragraph can be separated into smaller segments.
Thanks for visiting the blog and for asking this question. I appreciate it! It’s a topic I’d like to write about in an upcoming post.
~ Kris
Hi Kris! I was googling a question on POV writing and I came across your article, VERY helpful, thanks again.
I do have a scenario in a spec script I’m writing where the character’s point of view is distinctly different from the rest of the scene and I believe important to the plot. The scene takes place in a restaurant. How do I slug it? Would the example below be OK or should I just keep it as JOSHUA’S POV?
JOSHUA’S P.O.V. — RESTAURANT
Hi Nick,
The sluglines will vary depending on whether the scene starts off in the character’s POV or instead starts off in the standard format and then switches to the character’s POV in mid-scene.
If the scene starts off in the character’s POV and the whole scene will play out that way, you would use a slugline like this:
INT. RESTAURANT – NIGHT – JOSHUA’S POV
If the scene starts off in the standard format and then switches to the character’s POV in the middle of the scene, you would use a normal slugline like this at the beginning of the scene:
INT. RESTAURANT – NIGHT
and you would add a slugline like this at the point where the switch to the character’s POV occurs:
JOSHUA’S POV
I hope this helps! Thanks for checking out the blog!
~ Kris
Thanks so much, Kris! That definitely helps! :>)
I was wondering if I could bother you with one more question. In the same script I’m writing, I have a sequence where about seven different characters run through six different rooms of a mansion, with something specific entering each room.
What I was wondering is if I had to slug every room (like could I put VARIOUS ROOMS or something). If I do, is it OK to refer to the characters as a group rather than by each name?
For example, the characters are all celebrities. So could I refer to them as “The Celebrities” rather than typing our each name?
Hi Nick,
I’ve seen it done two different ways. With the first method, you would use a normal slugline for the first room, like this:
INT. MANSION DINING ROOM – NIGHT
and then you would use a similar slugline for each consecutive room as the characters run through, but replace “NIGHT” with “CONTINUOUS” to indicate the action flows continuously from one room into the next.
With the second method, you would use a normal slugline for the first scene, but you would use an abbreviated slugline for each subsequent room and blend it into the action, so the final result would look like this:
INT. MANSION DINING ROOM – NIGHT
Here’s some action. Stuff happens. You’d describe it as you normally would.
And then the group runs into the
KITCHEN
And some more action happens in the kitchen. You’d describe the action, describe any important features the characters see, include dialogue as usual, etc.
Desperate to escape the kitchen, they frantically race into the
LIVING ROOM
In most cases, you should use a full slugline any time the location changes, even if you’re only moving from one room to the next in the same house. (Technically, a new scene occurs any time the lighting equipment has to be moved, which means each new room is considered a new scene.) But, I’ve seen it done successfully the second way too, and sometimes using the abbreviated sluglines gives the reader the illusion of a faster-paced scene.
When you’re describing the action, you can refer to the characters as “the group”, “everyone”, “the crowd”, “the celebrities”, etc., if they’re all doing the same thing.
~ Kris
Hey Kris
I have a similar problem to Kiki.
I am an experineced short film maker and I am trying to make the leap to writing a feature. The time has come to think about timing.
I am writing a really slow, quiet, dark drama. And I have pretty much finished the first draft and I’m only at 60 pages.
I am positive that translated into film through prior experience of the kind of filmmaker I am that these 60 pages will be about a 2 hour film.
In this case, should I be more descriptive to pad out the script to the right length?
I just realized I never wrote you a thank you for your help – thanks so much!!
Hi Dennis,
Are you planning to direct and film the feature yourself? If so, I’d recommend leaving it as it is. As the director, you’ll be able to film each scene the way you envision it.
If you’re not planning to make the film yourself, it’s a tough call. I’m of the opinion that you should never pad a script with unnecessary scenes, and you should never drag out the description if something can be described in a concise way while still conveying vivid imagery.
On the other hand, some readers will see a 60-page script and think it can’t possibly be any good since it’s so short, so you’re left with a dilemma. You could try incorporating a subplot and tying it into the main storyline, or try to find new angles to explore in the original storyline. If it’s done right, it will enhance the story instead of acting as padding. The most important thing is to make sure every new scene is necessary and serves a purpose (or preferably more than one purpose).
~ Kris
Kris – somewhere, somehow, along the way, something, in my mind keeps tellin’ me the use of the word “is” in narrative description is not sound execution of the craft?
Waitin’ patiiently for an olive branch to be extended
Benjamin,
There is nothing wrong with “is” per se. However, when possible, you should favor “active” verbs over “passive” or state-of-being verbs.
I think the main thing to watch out for with “is” is the temptation to embed non-visual information in the action. For example, if you have a scene with a guy in a suit walking down the street, you wouldn’t want to say he “is a lawyer.” The camera can’t see that he “is a lawyer.” You need to think of a way to get it across that this man is a lawyer either visually or through dialogue.
Personally, I think the best way to learn screenplay style (distinct from format) is to read screenplays. There are a number of folks who publish their screenplays, and they are worth reading over and over.
Hi Kris, just wanted to say that your article helps a lot! I always wondered about the continue & continued… thought it wasted space as well. I hate it <_<
Fantastic blog, really cuts to the point. Some sites are so entrenched in the use of CONTINUED, CUT TO, SOUNDS it’s hard to get any clear information. This blog really clears my mind. Thanks.